中国古代就有家用传统的手动工具且发展繁荣,如传统剪刀,锤子等,但是这些工具多用于手工艺产品的维护和制作。由于家用手动工具的职能转变,使用的频率和范围不断增加,并且任何工业产品,一旦进入家庭,就必然被赋予全新的外观和内涵,就必然有了家用设计的趋势和家用设计的风格要求。这使得家用手动工具需要更加全面的人性化设计来满足人的需求。手工具人性化是主体为“工具”与客体“人”的有机结合,通过客体的需求体现在载体“工具”的身上。工具的使用是建立在人的基础上,人使用工具不仅需要满足功能,也要注重人性化的因素。
In ancient China, there were traditional hand tools for household use, such as traditional scissors, hammers, etc., which developed and prospered, but these tools were mostly used for the maintenance and production of handicraft products. Due to the functional transformation of household hand tools, the frequency and range of use continue to increase, and any industrial product, once it enters the home, will inevitably be given a new appearance and connotation, and there will inevitably be the trend of home design and the style requirements of home design. This makes household hand tools require a more comprehensive and user-friendly design to meet people's needs. The humanization of hand tools is an organic combination of the subject as a "tool" and the object "human", which is reflected in the carrier "tool" through the needs of the object. The use of tools is ba-sed on people. People use tools not only to satisfy functions, but also to focus on human factors.
在手动工具迅速发展的同时,许多设计上的问题也随之出现。在家用手动工具领域,经常出现因操作不当而发生安全问题。越来越多女性及青少年用户在生活上也会使用手动工具,而目前手动工具设计主要针对男性用户,其人机尺寸、外观设计等对女性及青少年等力量较小的用户并不友好。现有家用手动工具在设计上还存在种类过于繁多易丢失的问题。通用设计理念是指对于产品的设计和环境的考虑是尽最大可能面向所有的使用者的一种创造设计理念。
本设计结合通用设计理念,尝试通过调查家用手动工具品类中各类工具的使用频率,对家用手动工具套装进行简化,解决种类繁琐、收纳麻烦、体积臃肿的问题。并对各品类工具进行结构改良设计,针对女性及青少年等力气较小用户,使其达到提高易用性、提升安全性的目的。
With the rapid development of manual tools, many design problems have also emerged. In the field of household hand tools, safety problems often occur due to improper operation. More and more female and young users also use hand tools in their daily lives. At present, the design of hand tools is mainly aimed at male users, and their ergonomic size and appearance design are not friendly to users with less power such as women and teenagers. Existing household hand tools still have the problem of too many types and easy to lose in design. The universal design concept means that the product design and environmental considerations are a creative design concept for all users as far as possible.
This design combines the general design concept to try to simplify the household hand tool set by investigating the frequency of use of various tools in the household hand tool category, and solve the problems of cumbersome types, troublesome storage, and bloated size. The structural improvement design of various types of tools is aimed at women and teenagers who are less powerful users, so that they can achieve the purpose of improving ease of use and safety.
传统手动工具在使用经验不足的情况下容易受伤,并且无效的配件繁琐,其使用体验对女性用户并不友好。
Traditional hand tools are prone to injury when they are inexperienced, and invalid accessories are cumbersome, and their use experience is not friendly to female users.
由分析常见物品的外观造型元素可了解到:
危险性较高物品的造型元素通常有:锐角三角形、细长条形等带有尖锐造型的元素。这类造型元素容易营造出具有危险性的造型语义。
危险性较低的物品造型元素有:圆形、圆角矩形、椭圆形及不规则圆角造型元素。这类造型元素容易营造出亲和的、危险性低的造型语义。
By analyzing the appearance and modeling elements of common objects, we can understand:
The styling elements of high-risk items usually include: acute-angled triangles, slender bars and other elements with sharp shapes. Such styling elements are easy to create dangerous styling semantics.
The modeling elements of objects with lower risk are: round, rounded rectangle, ellipse and irregular rounded shape elements. Such styling elements are easy to create a friendly and low-risk styling semantics.
通过大量的简易模型进行方案可行性分析。
The feasibility analysis of the scheme is carried out through a large number of simple models.
可从以下三个方面来总结此次的设计:
第一:
查阅大量的文献资料,对家用手动工具的背景及现状进行了解,了解了现有家用手动工具的种类以及特点。对家用手动工具的安全性进行了分析调研,总结出了造成安全问题的家用手动工具的共同点,以及不同的造型语义给人的直观感受。
第二:
以用调查问卷及用户访谈的形式,了解到了女性及青少年等力气较小的用户对于家用手动工具的需求,如造型语义方面,使用场景方面,材质方面等,并对得出的数据进行了分析,得出了相应的结论,此结论对设计方案有着很大的帮助。
第三:
在完成了设计调研的情况下,依据通用设计理念对家用手动工具进行设计构思,旨在提高安全性、提高易用性、摒弃繁琐使用率低的部件,摒弃单一功能性实现的冷漠感和毫无情感表现的造型形态与色彩,体现出工具的亲和力,营造一种“轻松使用”的气氛,体现出家用手动工具的人性化设计。
The design can be summarized from the following three aspects:
01:
Consult a large amount of literature, understand the background and current situation of household hand tools, and understand the types and characteristics of existing household hand tools. The safety of household hand tools is analyzed and investigated, and the common points of household hand tools that cause safety problems are summarized, as well as the intuitive feelings of different modeling semantics.
02:
In the form of questionnaires and user interviews, I learned about the needs of less powerful users such as women and adolescents for household manual tools, such as modeling semantics, usage scenarios, and materials. After analyzing and drawing corresponding conclusions, this conclusion is of great help to the design scheme.
03:
After completing the design research, design and conceive household hand tools ba-sed on general design concepts, aiming to improve safety, ease of use, abandon cumbersome parts with low usage, and abandon the indifference of a single functional realization And the shape and color without emotional ex-pression, reflect the affinity of tools, create an atmosphere of "easy to use", and reflect the humanized design of household hand tools.
谢谢观看!
Thanks for watching !
专利保护,禁止商用,一经发现将依法追究法律责任,原创不易,感谢配合!
Patent protection, commercial use is prohibited, once discovered, legal responsibility will be investigated according to law, original creation is not easy, thank you for your cooperation!
本作品版权归 ZENMOKE 所有,禁止匿名转载及个人使用,任何商业用途均需联系原作者。
举报156赞 37评论 11939人气
70赞 22评论 5442人气
138赞 41评论 10553人气
138赞 38评论 10796人气
确认要删除该条评论吗?
已有 2 人赞赏
最高赞赏200元
使用支付宝扫描二维码完成支付
使用微信扫描二维码完成支付
当前余额:¥0.00
支付操作会向你普象账户的注册手机号发送验证码
请注意查收
扫一扫添加
普象商务
扫一扫添加
客服微信
扫一扫下载
手机APP
关于各位朋友的疑问,我在此做几点声明:
01. 是否抄袭这个问题,我不做解释,每个人对于抄袭都有不同的定义。
02. 我的作品《TYR - 家用手工具设计》
具有《实用新型专利》二项、《版权登记》一项等众多 合法 且 办理完成 的 手续文件。
03. 各位所谓的正义人士、设计大师、文学大师等,如觉得侵犯到您的利益了、让您觉得不公平或者不爽了,欢迎使用法律手段维护您的权利。而不是在屏幕背后当个键盘侠,这世界太多键盘侠了,会显得平庸。
04. 至于删评,并不存在普象官方控评之类的事。目前所有的删评都是因为人身攻击、谩骂等被举报删除的。关于作品讨论没问题,欢迎讨论。但是上升到人身攻击就没素质了,先做个有教养的人,再争取做个优秀的设计师。
05. 最后,感谢各位大佬捧场哈,预祝即将到来的假期快乐!
解决,不同人设计最终结果不可能这么相似,可
能结构原理一样,但外观上的表现绝对不可能相
似到这种程度。所以,不要抄的这么理直气壮
6
这不是。。。一样的嘛
这个有点像了
这么好的设计不去申请红点,IF可惜了
给爷整吐了
https://www.yankodesign.com/2017/11/07/hammering-home-a-new-design-language/有一说一,和这个有点像
啧啧啧
大佬你天生就是干这行的料!
没有对你人身攻击,也没骂你,为啥要删我评论QAQ,我只是给你看看大佬的设计作品,我们可以一起讨论、对比、学习呀
对于这种人和他讲教养就是对教养的侮辱吧
人家把设计整合了,怎么能算抄呢?都闭嘴吧
普象越来越有水平了!!设计师同是!!作品同是!!
有人在光明下堂而皇之的行走,有人在黑暗中努力向上